![]() Johnsen of booking the expedition upon false pretenses and bringing firearms with the intent of shooting Bigfoot, rather than merely watching Bigfoot and, ideally, communing with Bigfoot in some socially acceptable form or other. Johnsen's conduct on the expedition was quite inappropriate, and in his disquiet even stooped to use words like "not in the same reality as us" and even the insult-crescendo "colorful, middle-aged, paranoid schitzo from Tampa." He even accused Mr. This cheek quite overcame the better angels of Mr. So if you want the people here or anywhere to hold anything you say as the truth, perhaps a soul searching is in order. ![]() He concluded, using the wit now in fashion among Florida's devotees of Mr. Moneymaker of premising the expedition on money rather than art and science (surely this was a deft thrust at an unfortunate last name), and of mismanaging it entirely. Johnsen fired the first salvo, accusing Mr. Moneymaker and Johnsen have both philosophical and personal disputes, and allowed those disputes to ripen into open and notorious hostility. It would be uncouth to delve into all of the details ought not such things remain between gentlemen? Suffice it to say that Mssrs. John Johnsen, heir to the Grendel Films fortune and author of the esteemed philosophical work Hunt the Dogman. The expedition - conducted by the intrepid Matthew Moneymaker, of the California Moneymakers - was quite ruined as a result of a disagreement between Moneymaker and Mr. But something went badly awry in 2005 during the Bigfoot Field Researchs Organization Expedition, an annual social event that is a jewel of the season like the Kentucky Derby or the opening of a new production of Die Walküre. Some say that Bigfoot (never say Bigfeet they'll wonder if you came in by the servant's entrance) migrated to Florida for its warmer climes and the easy supply of food (particularly in the late afternoon and early evening hours) those prone to unkindness suggest that the migration was a result of a Bigfoot flight seeking refuge from the increasing prevalence of Chupacabra-Americans in their traditional realms in the West.įlorida is supposed to be a land of civility and good judgment. Bigfoot-hunting has a rich tradition in Florida. That, apparently, is an error on the level of believing that Duke is one of the Ivies. I admit that I - embarrassingly untutored in these things - labored under the naive belief that Bigfoot is a phenomenon of the Pacific Northwest. Our story takes us to the aforementioned Florida, where Bigfoot is sought by our players. ![]() So you see, when one Florida Bigfoot hunter accused another Florida Bigfoot hunter of being crazy, the latter had no choice but to sue for defamation. And yet even Bigfoot hunters - elite as they are - can encounter self-doubt when they ask themselves, "yes, my poise and quality have made me a Bigfoot hunter, but do I possess the savoir-faire necessary to achieve a position amongst the Bigfoot hunters of Florida? Can I persevere in that imperial land, where the exacting standards for urbanity and good deportment strain the abilities even of graduates of the finest finishing schools in Tampa and Orlando?"īy necessity, when swimming in these heady waters, a good reputation is everything. In turn, those admitted to the drawing-rooms and salons of the cryptidologists know that only the most polished among them can aspire to the rarefied circle of Bigfoot hunters, the royalty of the cryptid-seeking community. But there are still some places where decorum and good breeding are expected and even demanded.įor instance, anyone acquainted with cryptid enthusiasts knows that a gentleman seeking introduction to their society must first build a solid repute for probity. Twitter is still where the abusive can rail on and on before they get canned, while anyone with an earnest interest in using the site in good faith must adhere to vague, unhelpful policies in how they deal with all that trash.America is an increasingly crass nation, true. Now, if Twitter reviews this, and thinks that's the right result - well, that would be something else again. Want a platform with no dumb policies? Create one or pay for one.įor the moment, I doubt this reflects an evaluation by anyone at Twitter that "it's okay for a deranged bigot to threaten people on Twitter but not okay to publish his threats." Rather, this is part of the inevitable result of automating responses to abuse complaints. When you use a "free" service like Twitter and Facebook, you're buying into the policies and attitudes they pursue, for better or worse. It's got the right to free speech and free association. It has every right to suspend me or kick me off, however foolish its reason. But it was White's response that fell afoul of Twitter's mysterious rules on posting personally identifying information-even when such information is disclosed and widely publicized.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |